Talk:Louise Farrenc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Ok, now I know the source of Jacques-Edme Dumont (m:fr:Louise Farrenc, or whatever its sources are, most likely) but it still seems wrong. Does anyone have an independent source? Edme seems wrong, but I do not speak French well. Schissel | Sound the Note! 15:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Born by her father?[edit]

Did she by any chance have a mother, too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.47.170.35 (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louise Farrenc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another...[edit]

... attempt by feminists to manufacture a 'repressed' star from a mediocrity. Oh dear, she has been 'written out of history' by the patriarchy? Tsk tsk. A great many mediocre male artists of middling ability have disappeared. Their work was 'of its time', it gathered as much kudos as it deserved, and then taste changed and they were forgotten. Who will revive and celebrate the work of unremarkable men? 124.168.123.210 (talk) 21:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place for polemics. We don't care whether reputable sources about notable people were written by feminists, satanists or regular people. Our personal views about our subjects should never play any role in creating and improving articles. Otherwise, the only editors who would ever have anything to do with our Adolf Hitler article would be neo-Nazis, David Irving and their ilk. If you don't want to be involved in improving this article, just go and edit an article on someone or something you do like. Simples. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not only that, but Farrenc really is a case of a superb artist who was written out of history by the patriarchy. Male critics were observing it AT THE TIME. Everybody (everybody knowledgeable, that is) was singing her praises and basically saying, Ah, but because she's a woman, nobody is going to pay attention to her. And guess what--they were right. She was not "of middling ability" or "unremarkable." Her compositions should be taught in music schools. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]