Talk:Lucien Goldmann

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Untitled[edit]

hello all, this article is looking much healthier than when i last saw it! i'm pretty sure that "Ecole des Hautes Etudes" in Paris actually refers to the EHESS (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales).

Text lifted from Princeton U.P. summary[edit]

I glanced at the text in the section of this entry on Goldmann's thinking and then at the Princeton U. Press summary of Mitchell Cohen's book on Goldmann (linked at the bottom of the entry). The text appears to have been taken pretty much straight from the Princeton U.P. summary without quotation marks or other acknowledgment. I assume this violates Wikipedia policy.Redound (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]