Talk:Lucy, the Daughter of the Devil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Just out of curiosity, is DJ Jesus supposed to look like John Peel? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.133.71 (talk) 04:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Character summaries[edit]

I would like to trim these down to the essentials, meaning get rid of information that arises from a single episode. For example, Jesus' description includes: "He's also an escape artist and, ironically, also claustrophobic, though he claims that all escape artists are claustrophobic, which makes them want even more to escape from whatever they're trapped in." That's really only relevant for one episode, and isn't a central themes for the character. If his claustrophobia was plot point in every other episode, it would be worth mentioning here. The entries for Becky and Judas are excellent examples of what this section should be, I think. Any comments, or should I just take a swipe at this? Torc2 (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were shorter, people keep re-adding trivial things like the Senator turned into a monster and the DJ is claustrophobic.«»bd(talk stalk) 04:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
True, but it's no big deal if we just have to keep fixing it. I'm more interested whether you agree with that approach? Torc2 (talk) 06:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If people keep putting it in, that means that is what the general audience wants. Intellectual snobbery is a waste of energy. Given that the show is only 10 11-minute episodes, something that happens in 1 episode happens 10% of the time. That's pretty damn significant for a character if you ask me.ClintJCL (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is not "intellectual snobbery" to want a well-written article. Other forms of spam are not tolerated, and adding trivia inappropriately to the character descriptions should not be either. - Marvin01 | talk 20:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First aired[edit]

Which is correct, the 2005 date or the 2007 date? I would argue the 2005 date. Even though the full series began airing in 2007, the article is about the cartoon as a whole. The first time the show was aired on TV was 2005. Torc2 (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put the series date into the infobox with a daggared note that gives the first airing of the pilot. Putting the pilot into the box makes it seem like the show has been running since then, when much of that time there was no show.«»bd(talk stalk) 20:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Before we get into an edit war over this, I'll throw the question at iTemplate talk:Infobox Television. I see arguments both ways. The show was first aired in 2005, but the line for the infobox actually reads "first run", so that kind of points to 2007. Torc2 (talk) 05:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second season?[edit]

Has there been any news of a second season? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.70.55.116 (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lucy, the Daughter of the Devil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]