Talk:Lydian language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Classification within Anatolian[edit]

Billposer, here is the exact quote from Anatolian Luwian / Hittite expert Professor MacQueen on p. 159, regarding Lydian:

"Linguistically Lydian too is related to the Hittite-Luwian group, but the curious thing is that unlike most of its contemporaries it seems to be a descendant of the Hittite rather than the Luwian sub-branch. One has to assume that in the disturbances following the collapse of the Hittite Empire a central Anatolian group had seized power among the ruins of Arzawa, and a memory of this may be preserved in the Herodotean story of a Heraclid dynasty with eastern connections which gained power in Lydia about 1200 BC. One king of this dynasty has the name Myrsilus, and we may see in him a late descendant and namesake of the Hittite king Mursilis."

The reference you added was a 2004 work by a Benjamin Fortson. Would you mind quoting exactly what he might have to say, that might contadict this view; I have also read in other earlier works that Lydian language is considered to come from Hittite instead of Luwian. Thanks! ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 15:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MacQueen's expertise is in history and archaeology. He has no expertise in linguistics. I have added a reference to an article by Craig Melchert, one of the leading specialists in Anatolian languages. At pp. 601-602 he says:

the position of Lydian within the Anatolian group is unique and problematic...Lydian undeniably shows a number of features which are not shared by any other language of the Anatolian group. The limited evidence makes assessment of this fact difficult: are these unique features archaisms preserved only in Lydian, or do they result from a series of peculiarly pre-Lydian developments? Until a more satisfactory answer to this question is available, the status of Lydian within Anatolian will remain a "special" one.

I'm travelling and don't have my copy of Fortson to hand, but he too regards Lydian as an oddball within Anatolian. I am not aware of any recent source by a professional Indo-Europeanist that regards Lydian as a descendant of Hittite or Luwian. When I asked him about this by email Melchert was surprised at the idea and said that it must be someone's misunderstanding of the linguistic literature. The actual debate among the experts, now considered settled, has been whether Lydian belongs to the Anatolian subgroup at all. Bill 15:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now considered settled? What do you mean there? What settlement did they reach? I'm going to use Adiego as a source and he presents it as Anatolian using also the words "special position within Anatolian." This presents a certain problem for Wikipedia articles (they are no doubt easily problematic), as Lydia is presented as being on the location of Arzawa and Arzawa is presented as having spoken Luwian. If that is so then where does the special position come from? Melchert is professionally very polite but I don't have to be so polite. I have read more baloney on the Internet about Lydian in the last few days than I ever read in the previous 20 years. I'll never read another book about it without a very careful assessment of who wrote the book. Myths of the Tyrrhenian Trojans and Lydian Etruscans die pretty hard. Are there some Etruscans in there somewhere, maybe just a pocket or two, that don't show up in Arzawa? Can there really be similarites between Lydian and Etruscan even though they are not even of the same family? So, the Arzawa article needs to be gone over and if in fact Arzawa was there and it did in fact speak Luwian then these discrepancies need to be pointed out in the articles.Dave (talk) 03:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I won't argue with Melchert, he is indeed without a doubt the highest caliber expert on the subject, but I can't help wondering where MacQueen got this idea, and I do vaguely recall seeing it elsewhere, so if I ever find a more fuller explanation some day, I'll let ya know here! Have a nice day, ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 17:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking out script[edit]

I found at least as much material on Lydian as I did on Lycian so what I plan to do is break out Lydian script parallel to Lycian script. I can say at least as much in Lydian language and Lydian Script as is said in Lycian language and Lycian script using the same sources and will before I finish this session.Dave (talk) 03:y08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The word Laqrisa=wall[edit]

In Greece there is the city of Larisa or Larissa. To my knowledge there are other Larissas, mainly in Asia Minor.The word Laqrisa, besides wall,p robably means fortified position, acropolis.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.100.48 (talk) 09:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lydian text in reverse order[edit]

The Lydian text in the paragraph "Sample text and vocabulary" is printed in reverse order. This happens when pasting a dextrosinistral text into a LTR surrounding. Check http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/didact/idg/anat/lydbeisp.htm.Cgkrejci (talk) 10:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lydian language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

Some notes and questions for improvement of the article.

  • The lede gives 𐤮𐤱𐤠𐤭𐤣𐤸𐤯𐤦𐤳 Śfardẽtis "[language] of Sardis". There is at least one misspelling, since the Lydian characters have 𐤸 (Latin ν) where the Latin has ẽ (Lydian 𐤶). We could assume that the Latin is correct and correct the Lydian, but no source is given. Is this an attested word, or someone's guess at what the Lydians would have called their language?
  • In the sample text, the Lydian and Latin versions have a mismatch: Line 3, word 4: Lydian 𐤨𐤰𐤪𐤩𐤦𐤩, Latin kumlilid. If the source is the Melchert PDF on the Wayback Machine, the Latin version seems to be correct.
  • The sample text is a bilingual with Aramaic, so shouldn't there be a column with the meaning in English? Or at least a general description of what the text is about?
  • In "examples of words", the Etruscan and Phoenician letter SVGs may have been helpful at one time, but in the current article they seem redundant and don't format well.

I'm hesitant to tinker with fixing these without having clear sourcing. --Amble (talk) 16:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to User:Hans van Deukeren for adding an English translation of the bilingual text! --Amble (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only a small fraction of the Lydian vocabulary is clearly of Indo-European stock[edit]

Meaning that the rest is also IE, albeit less clearly, or that the rest is non-EI? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:E0BD:9135:8786:E956 (talk) 09:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lydian_language&oldid=1195693820"