Talk:Mégantic (federal electoral district)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Quebec / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

Requested move 04:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 17:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mégantic (electoral district) → Mégantic (federal electoral district) – WP:PDAB; we have Mégantic (provincial electoral district), the disambiguatory term should not be ambiguous ; and while this district is defunct, the provincial one is extant. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Disambiguating terms should indeed not be ambiguous. Defeats the purpose, lol. Support Red Slash 08:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I'm generally against adding "federal" as a bad for any riding. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is that? It isn't a provincial riding, nor is it a municipal electoral district, and there is a provincial riding with the same name, that unlike this defunct one, is actually in the legislature. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. And should this title become a disambiguation page or should we move the provincial district here and just add a hatnote? 216.8.148.18 (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- IMO, "Mégantic (electoral district)" should redirect to "Mégantic" -- 76.65.128.222 (talk)

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.