Talk:M/A/R/C Research

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

I would like to request that this article be reviewed and the speedy deletion tag removed. I believe the requirements of objectivity have been met. Independent sources have been cited. I believe that there is nothing here that constitutes blatant advertising.

Please advise.

Thanks for your consideration in the matter.

Tfsummers (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This entire article reeks of ad-speak. It needs to be written in an objective manner, not as if it's been cut from their own website (which I'm not saying it has been, but it reads like that). Corvus cornix_talk 00:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That so, but I like the sources and will keep the article for now just based on the research. Hard to rewrite it without sources. hbdragon88 (talk) 01:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll work on trying to make it more objective. It will probably be a few days if that's okay.

Tfsummers (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

216.158.181.240 (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, if anyone could cite a couple of examples of articles about corporations that are done particularly well, that might be very helpful.

Tfsummers (talk) 17:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on M/A/R/C Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]