Talk:M1 (Johannesburg)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M1 road (Johannesburg). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on M1 road (Johannesburg). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Route Maintenance[edit]

Under the "Route" section, it reads that the northern section from Corlett Drive northwards is maintained by SANRAL, while it also reads somewhere within that paragraph that there is a northern section maintained by the "Gauteng Provincial Government". Are we saying that the "Gauteng Provincial Government" & "SANRAL" are one in this regard? Is the "SANRAL Section" the same as the "Provincial Government Section"? Somebody please clarify. Chils Kemptonian (talk) 02:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chils. I would say no. There seems to be a historical answer as to why ownership changes on the route. I believe the Johannesburg City boundry ended around Corlett Drive in the 60s and early 70s, and that is as far as they built the M1 but at the same time the Transvaal Provincial Authority (TAP) and the South African government's National Transport Commission were building the N1 from Pretoria and N3 bypass to Buccleugh Interchange and then connected the N1 onto the M1 at Corlett Drive so the latter two were responsible for the north of it. Now we have the Johannesburg Road Authority, Gauteng Provincial Government (duties of the old TAP) and SANRAL (the State) with interests in it. Unsure if the Management Order has been changed. Further investigation is needed. Conlinp (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For The Details. Chils Kemptonian (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]