Talk:MG2 (company)

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested edit[edit]

MulvannyG2 Architecture has officially moved its headquarters to Seattle, Washington and has changed it's name to MG2 as of 5/11/15. Leadership has also changed. All changes will be further cemented when MG2 announces it's move and rebrand to the public on 5/19/15. We'd like to update MulvannyG2 Architecture's Wikipedia page to reflect these changes by editing the title and body to the following:

MG2 (formerly MulvannyG2 Architecture)

MG2 (formerly MulvannyG2 Architecture) is a U.S.-based architecture firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington. MG2 partners with businesses around the world to create meaningful transformation through architectural services, planning, interior design, brand strategy, and consulting services. MG2 is consistently ranked among the largest architecture firms in the nation and among the top retail design firms in the world.

Founded in 1971, MG2 serves clients around the globe from four offices: Seattle, WA; Irvine, CA; Washington, DC and Shanghai. Leadership: Mitch Smith, AIA, LEED AP, CEO, Chairman; Russ Hazzard - AIA, President.

Source: http://www.mg2.com/ http://www.mulvannyg2.com

Carlennsmith (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 February 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved; suggested alternative MG2 (company) is an option. In any case please do add the company to the MG2 disambig page. Dicklyon (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MulvannyG2 Architecture → MG2
MG2 → MG2 (disambiguation)

– The firm is probably the most-requested item with "MG2" in the name, and is now officially named as such. Other pages in the letter-number disambiguation category show past precedent in moving this. Shouldn't be controversial, but just in case. Sounder Bruce 05:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this firm isn't even listed on the dab page [1] (which hasn't been modified since 2014) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- oppose a recent corporate name change to MG2, so no indication it is the primary topic of "MG2" (unlike "MulvannyG2"); In Google, there appears to be no such indication of dominance for this firm [2]; Google Image Search is dominated by guns [3]; Google Book Search is dominated by magnesium [4] -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - However, the firm is the only entry that is officially named MG2, the others are abbreviations for longer names. Sounder Bruce 14:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - That doesn't make it the primary topic. WP:OFFICIALNAME it doesn't matter what the official name is, other names also qualify as names. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Was waiting on this to go through before adding it, since it would be useless to add the redirect (with a piped link) into there. Sounder Bruce 14:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 70.51.46.39. The gun is at least as prominent as this recently renamed company. — Amakuru (talk) 12:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move to MG2 (company). It appears the name has indeed changed, and the sources are using the new name. However, there doesn't seem to be consensus that this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, so it may be worth revisiting in a few months when we can look at the page stats.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.