Talk:Maalaala Mo Kaya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Mmklogo 2007.JPG[edit]

Image:Mmklogo 2007.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Standard for philippine drama[edit]

I'm concerned on the phrase: "MMK has become a standard in Philippine drama." I'm relatively new to wikipedia and it just sends me as weird to have something so subjective or is there an authority out there we can cite for the above phrase? Thanks

--Yakulto (talk) 12:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi..[edit]

i would like to share a story about my mom and my family, but i want it to be anonymous... could that be possible?, thank you.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.91.196 (talk) 11:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced, but is it possible to include in proper proportionality?[edit]

I removed the following sourced content from the article. I am having trouble thinking of a way to include it that does not give what seems to me from the outside as WP:UNDUE weight. If pretty much anytime someone mentions Maalaala Mo Kaya - the reaction is "Ooooh, that Blusa episode" then it should probably stay, but if the general reaction to "Maalaala Mo Kaya" and the Blusa episode" the reaction is "Huh?" then I dont think it needs to be in the article. WP:NOTNEWS Active Banana (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blusa ("Blouse"): A controversial episode starring Angel Locsin and Dimples Romana that focuses on a story of a UP Los Baños summa cum laude graduate who found herself applying as a Guest Relations Officer (GRO), shown February 28, 2009. UPLB released a statement pointing out the credibility of the facts presented in the episode.[1] On March 10, 2009, ABS-CBN issued an apology for not verifying with UPLB the veracity of the facts.[2]

hi maam charo...magandang araw po,saan ko po pwd ilathala ang kwento na ang aking buhay .,.gusto ko po sana ibahagi ang storya ng buhay ko para naman po mahayagan ang lahat ng mga tao na may pamilya...ito po yong contact num ko 09216839896..say....thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.55.164.67 (talk) 02:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "UPLB reacts to Angel Locsin's Blusa episode in MMK". PEP.ph. March 6, 2009.
  2. ^ "ABS-CBN issues statement regarding controversial "Blusa" episode of MMK". PEP.ph. March 9, 2009.

MMK Klasiks[edit]

Should we create a list of MMK Klasiks episode? I know it is the same episodes from the main series but since we can't retrieve a complete list of episodes from the show's first year until present. It should be noted though that listing of MMK Klasiks episodes should specify the original airdate, if available.180.190.151.85 (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maalaala Mo Kaya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

E,s,p[edit]

Story mmk writer tagalog version 136.158.65.172 (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]