Talk:Maeun-tang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hanja[edit]

Need hanja for 매운. Badagnani 23:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

매운 is not a Hanja. It's just a korean word. Stevefis 00:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then what does the dictionary say is the origin/root words/etymology of this term. Sometimes it has hanja but nobody knows (unless one looks in an excellent, thick Korean dictionary). Do you have one of those? I don't. Badagnani 00:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though I'm not a Korean langauge expert, I was born Korean and it is my first mother langauge so I can explain it to you. There are three types of Korean words in Korean language. The first one is pure Korean that has its origin in ancient korea when hanja wasn't even used (really long time ago). Another one is Koreans that were derived from ancient Chinese words or Hanja. (It's kinda similar to English words that were derived from Latins) The third one is Korean words that are derived from other foreign words such as english like television (텔레비젼). The word 매운 does not have any root in Hanja or Chinese word and it is one of the original Korean word that can be only expressed in Korean letters or Hangul. (매운 means hot) The other pure Korean words are 좋다, 나쁘다, 슬기, etc and there are very many of them in Korean language.Stevefis 01:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maeun-tang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]