Talk:Magic: The Gathering World Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

external link[edit]

The external link seems to lead to a random search page, nothing useful.

that appears fixed now. Boneyard 12:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Can anyone add the Legacy format decklists too? And maybe the format of the whole tournament?

Day 1 (Wednesday, November 29) 6x Standard format (Swiss)

Day 2 (Thursday, November 30) 2x Time Spiral Booster Draft format (each one consisting of 3x Swiss)

Day 3 (Friday, December 1) 6x Extended format (Swiss)

Day 4 (Saturday, December 2) 4x Team Rochester Draft format (New Draft for each round)

Day 5 (Sunday, December 3) Individual Players top 8s, and Top 2 National teams.

Reenen Laurie - 10:47, 29 November 2006 (+2 GMT)

Frank Karsten[edit]

It appears that the article linked to for Frank Karsten is for a completely different person... --Drantin (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Fixed that. OdinFK (talk) 10:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Player nationality[edit]

Anyone against using flagicons for the nationality? It is more beautyful while making the site more clear. OdinFK (talk) 11:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order of championships[edit]

The order of the championships should be changed to chronological instead of inverse chronological. If nobody gives a good reason not to, I'll do that in a few days. OdinFK (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the World Championships[edit]

Wizards just announced that the World Championships will now be split into a Magic World Cup team event, set to take place at Gen Con, and the new 16-player World Championship shall now be called the Magic Players Championship. I've tried to put that information into the article but I wasn't sure whether the article should continue to chronicle these new events or another page should be created for when they come around. [1] Olliewiththeface (talk) 23:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems[edit]

This article has quite a few problems from poorly sourced (and poorly verified) content and extensive use of WOTC sources. The external links themselves are also quite abundant. Plus a "decklist" link compared to the tables is somewhat inconsistent.

I would suggest that, instead of listing every card that a player had in their deck, we could list the primary colors used.

Regardless, I'm going to remove the poorly sourced material. Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 13:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]