Talk:Magic formula (Swiss politics)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Magic formula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141104192233/http://www.slatkine.com/fr/editions-slatkine/68201-book-07210607-9782832106075.html to http://www.slatkine.com/fr/editions-slatkine/68201-book-07210607-9782832106075.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Greens in 2019[edit]
There has to be some discussion about the Greens becoming 4th largest party but no seat in the Federal Council. Kaihsu (talk) 04:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 18 October 2022[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Magic formula → Magic formula (Swiss politics) – I doubt that the Swiss political concept is the primary topic for the term "magic formula". — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose in the absence of any evidence. Dohn joe (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support. This article trails well behind both magical formula and magic formula investing in pageviews (link here). I think the primary "magic formula" title would be most appropriate as a DAB between these three articles, but could also see the case for a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to magical formula. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 21:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Magic formula (disambiguation). Not just because this article trails well behind both magical formula and magic formula investing in pageviews, it evidently wouldn't be a PT for such a generic term in any case. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support page move and DAB. – QueenofBithynia (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support I was indeed surprised to it as primary topic. Superboilles (talk) 21:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)