Talk:Make It Hot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Make It Hot.JPG[edit]

Image:Make It Hot.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of "singles"[edit]

Propose merge of the two singles into this album article. The additional separate articles right now don't provide any added value. Cloudz679 (talk) 10:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now they do. Soccermeko (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Favor merge. The plot-ish description of the music video is pointless and all other info easily folds into the album article. If, at some point in the future, there are suddenly reliable sources providing substantially more encyclopedic info on the single, it can be easily spun off. At the moment, WP:MUSIC points toward a merge. "A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Favour merge also. Wenili3a (talk) 17:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course you going to say that when both of you are the same people. (Mdsummermsw and Cloudz679) Infostorm (talk) 15:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Infostorm is now indefinitely blocked as a sock of Soccermeko. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If both singles have charted, then they are considered notable per WP:MUSIC. I believe they don't need to be merged anymore. Victao lopes (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the singles need to be merge because it provides enough information already and also I saw a while back that a two album (Elektric Blue and Lovechild) were merge with (Elektric Blue EP and Fantasia Lovechild Bootleg) and they were deleted. I think you are trying to do this again with page. You can't page because they can't be proved or because the links are provide but you think that its not good enough. I'm going to waste time creating an account for a site that has false information on it. Just know whatever you do, everyone on the internet knows that this is a terrible site that can not be trusted. you can delete this if you want to but the truth will be heard about "WIKIPEDIA". 4.154.56.48 (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another blocked sock of Soccermeko. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this needs to be merged. I only here for Nicole and to make sure that the right information is added and editted. Nicolefan (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another blocked sock of Soccermeko. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Can't See and Eyes Better Not Wander should not be joined together. So this discussion is closed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.17.162 (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Please state your reasoning. One person making a decision is not a discussion with consensus. I've restored the merge tags. --Geniac (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
198.86.17.162 is another blocked sock of Soccermeko. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
first of all, all these people you claim are sockpuppets you need to stop with this witch hunt crap. second of all, everyone who has added the right information has been from the Nicole Wray Fanatics board. third of all, we trying to help, because people like [Mdsummermsw, Cloudz, KurtBox, and the rest where posting false information just like on the template and the discography page. fourth of all, the reason beening why it should separate should because it is a single and it does meet requirement. fifth, because the name that i just mention where taking the right information off and replacing it with false info. sixth, you think there is no head admin but there is. 4.154.2.73 (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Cabal will have to answer to the "head admin". - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The admin who blocked this sock of Soccermeko will have to answer to the head admin. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After 2 1/2 weeks, here are the results of the poll:

Any further comments? - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion of merge discussion[edit]

As per WP:MUSIC, Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for a prominent album or for the artist who wrote or prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.

The only encyclopaedic, referenced information on each of the two articles with the merge tag is the chart position. For this reason, I propose the articles are merged - a "reasonably detailed article" for these will never be available. Cloudz679 (talk) 13:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Make It Hot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Make_It_Hot&oldid=1211258610"