This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (it is actually backed by multiple scientific sources) --Ryoung122 17:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article is very sloppy and has no references. Please do not delete the template for deletion again... TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@TheRealWeatherMan: While Ryoung122 shouldn't have removed the speedy deletion tag, the {{db-nocontent}} tag was inapplicable, as the article had bona fide content. Also, the arguments you've given in your AFD nomination for deletion aren't valid grounds for deletion, as I've explained there. Your reasons are what maintenance tags are for. Largoplazo (talk) 18:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ryoung Footnotes should not be in the reference section. Many different citation styles are acceptable on Wikipedia, but under no citation system is it ok for the inline cites to be in the footnotes section. I voted keep at the AfD, but please try to work a bit neater in the future. SeraphWiki (talk) 00:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
