This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
As far as I know, in Venezuelan history Rodriguez is nothing but Bolivar's wife, and that is alraedy said in the article. I think that the tag is not necessary anymore. --Jdiazch 14:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
user:Elmidae I looked and didn't find anything in the MOS about not having refs in the lead (but I didn't look all that hard.) Can you point to something in the MOS that discusses this? RJFJR (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RJFJR: it's at MOS:LEADCITE. I've always taken the standard to be "only put refs in lead if statement is likely to be challenged, otherwise keep it free of refs". None of these seem controversial, so I'd move them out. In addition ref 3 is ONLY in the lede, which is a definite no-no, and should be attached to wherever that item is treated in the text body. - Probably should just do this but I was in NPP mode at the time and not intending to do much copy-editing along the way. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Elmidae: Thank you. That was what I was looking for and couldn't find. (That page also answered something I'd been meaning to look at and hadn't gotten to.) RJFJR (talk) 22:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]