This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Taken from the previous edit; "Before you revert it's very important that you've already explained clearly why the unit order should change to be mismatched rather than remain consistent."
I am not seeking to any change away from a UK-AUS or AUS-UK. I am also not opposing UK-AUS-USA or AUS-UK-USA. I am however against a change to the status quo that would see either the British or Australian standards supplanted for an American unit. Once again not against it, just against it having prominence. I wouldn't imagine that you would need to go into any detail on the fact that alot of British sources would not have the lb as a stand alone unit, but may well display metric before imperial. It's a two-fold reason as to why it should not have prominence, and the stand alone lb should potentially not even be there at all.Fleets (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
