Talk:Marie Walewska

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Why does the article say that she was blonde? The portrait shows her with light brown hair without any streak of yellow!

2008-06-01 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

Untitled[edit]

It is impossible to use the count title of Anastazy Walewski the first husband of maria Laczynska, bezause he and his family never obtained this title. The counts Colonna-Walewski in Poland was created in 19th century! The first count in this family was Alexander Jozef Colonna-Walewski the son of Marie and his legal husband Anastazy. But Napoleon gave this title for him - not for the family Colonna-Walewski

The article in English should give the same information like in Polish. Zaroszyc (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Marie or Maria? Ericoides (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait[edit]

The portrait appears to be a portrait of her daughter, Marie-Anne Walewska, Duchess Colonna-Walewski, née di Ricci (1823–1912). Hansen Dylan (talk) 23:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]