Talk:Mark Gruenwald

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Early Fan Writings[edit]

I would like to add a section on Gru's early fan writings. In addition to Omniverse, Gru published A Treatise on Reality in Comics Literature, and its shorter edited version, A Primer on Comic Book Reality. The Omniverse fanzine (which lasted two issues) was a spinoff of TORICL, and these helped get him the Amazing World of DC Comics assignments (an article on the Martian Manhunter's career in @ 13, and an extended JLA guide in @14).

I would like help with this, as I will be shifting my focus on professional/paid writing again soon, and won't be spending as much time on Wiki as I have the last few weeks. I don't have a sandbox set up for this yet, as I haven't used that, and am not sure I want to develop that skill at this time.

Thanks. Icarus 23 15:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering of his works[edit]

Am I the only person who thinks these should be alphabetical, rather than chronological? Ford MF 22:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um... yah, I'd have to say you're in the minority.
The convention is that, with writers and artists, works are listed by date first, then alphabetically if two or more were released/produced at the same time.
J Greb 22:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you could show me somewhere it says that, I'd be grateful, because it seems a convention that is not at all consistent or universal among wiki editors, e.g. John Byrne. Ford MF 22:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works) And that does mean that articles like Byrne's need to be cleaned up. — J Greb 22:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderman and Next Men[edit]

1) Over in John Byrne's 'Next Men' is a comic book publisher who stumbles upon -real- superheros. I don't quite remember why but said publisher ends up risking his life for artistic integrity. I'm pretty sure this dude was based on Mark. Anyone got any info?

2) There was a Spiderman issue produced soon after Mark's death. But this time the -villain-, well, I don't want to say too much because a bad guy is a bad guy. Anywho, drawn by Mike Weiringo and Spidey and Doctor Strange get put through the wringer. Again, any basis on real Mark? Poking fun? Coincidence? Lots42 15:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Gruenwald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy[edit]

The fourth issue of the JLA/Avengers 2003 four issue crossover also had a dedication on the back page to Gruenwald's memory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.29.205 (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Gruenwald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]