This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Hi. Not to be nitpicky, but there's been a lot of reverting on the question of exactly what time the Martial Law announcement broadcast took place. The source currently cited says 7:15 PM on September 23, but an anon keeps changing it to 7:17 PM. Given the 7:17 PM is uncited, I would normally argue against it. But the problem is, I think I remember reading it somewhere before - except I'm not sure where. (I also remember reading somewhere that it was 7:19 PM.) I know it all seems minor, but some clarity would be nice so we can stop with the reverts already. Someone wanna help? Thanks! - Chieharumachi (talk) 08:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am noticing a lot of loaded terms - off the top of my head I saw 'crony' a lot, and a reference to 'the administration chasing [peasants] from their land'. While this is a topic I am only just learning about, and I dont have a ton of editing experience or explicit familiarity with the ins and outs of wikipedias rules, the tone of the majority of this article does not fit what I would describe as a neutral point of view. Clinton(talk) 19:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cjarbo2: Hello! Thanks for pointing it out. Now that you mentioned it, the word "crony" is used twice. It didn't dawn on me until you pointed out that it is a loaded word as I personally thought that it's just a political jargon used for the cooperators of former president Marcos during the martial law. Should there be a label that it's Philippine English that is used in this article? That's up for another discussion though. Thanks!—Allenjambalaya (talk) 08:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
