Talk:Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMarvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starMarvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter is part of the Marvel vs. Capcom series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 29, 2016Good article nomineeListed
May 31, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Norimaro[edit]

Just because Norimaro is only available in overseas versions of the game doesn't mean the character shouldn't have an article. This is stupid. Give Norimaro his article back, and while you're at it, give Ruby Heart's and Amingo's articles back as well. Fclass 17:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Marvel Super Heroes VS Street Fighter.PNG[edit]

Image:Marvel Super Heroes VS Street Fighter.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment[edit]

Came here via the reassessment request in the talk page parameter; bumping this up to B-class. Some ideas for improvement follow:

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this within a couple of days. JAGUAR  19:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments[edit]

  • "is a crossover fighting game" - would recommend is a crossover fighting video game]
  • The lead is perfect
  • "It uses the same one-on-one tag" - minor recommendation, try utilizes
  • "The player fights waves of artificial intelligence-controlled teams in Arcade Mode" - might sound better as In Arcade Mode, the player fights waves of artificial intelligence-controlled teams
  • The Playable characters table seems to mess up the organisation of the article. I'm open to keeping it, so if you want to keep it, try simply shifting it to the right side - might help improve layout
  • "The game received a port to the Sega Saturn" - link port (as it was in the lead)
  • IGN shouldn't be italicised in the references
  • "Ryan Mac Donald of GameSpot expressed disappointment over the port's lower graphical quality and cut animation frames.[18]" - wrong citation given here. This is the IGN review and not the GameSpot one. Also, are you sure his name isn't MacDonald?
    • I'm not sure. That's how it was spelled in the review. Wani (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a decent article. I'll put it on hold until all of the above are clarified. JAGUAR  20:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • All done! Your suggestions have been incorporated. Also, thanks for reviewing both the articles I submitted for GAN. Wani (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for addressing them! This looks good to go now. I'll get to your other GAN later today. JAGUAR  14:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]