Talk:Mary Matalin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Validation of article performed by WIKICHECK. August 17 2006 17:12pm. WikiCheck 17:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC) Needs references and more bio-info.--FloNight 02:44, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

James Marriage Method[edit]

Didn't James say that he picked her up by trailing a 20 dollar bill through a trailer park? Serious (that he said it).TCO (talk) 22:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. He made that remark in the context of the Starr investigation and the Republicans trying to find women who would denigrate Bill Clinton. Nothing to do with Matalin. Cross Reference (talk) 12:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did she graduate from Hofstra Law?[edit]

I can't find that information. However, this article contradicts itself. In suggests (1) she earned her law degree from Hofstra, and (2) says she left after one year of law school to return to the RNC. It's one or the other... Which? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.194.252 (talk) 04:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 18, 2010 The Colbert Show Appearance[edit]

The section on Matalin's March 18, 2010 appearance on The Colbert Report includes unsubstantiated statements and POV statements. For example, the Bible does not clearly state anything, certainly not in English. There are multiple translations and people have been arguing for centuries about what the Bible actually says. The claim that the interview "was seen by many liberals as hypocrisy" needs citations. The citations should clearly prove that "many liberals" saw her interview as hypocritical. --Crunch (talk) 13:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should instead say that Colbert found it hypocritical as he alluded to earlier in the episode. 69.255.57.130 (talk) 18:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mary Matalin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Matalin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern[edit]

I am concerned with the use of ‘assistant’ in Matalin’s title. Ridiculous and subject to criticisms of gender discrimination 50.236.238.146 (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link to Matalin & Carville Times-Picayune op-ed[edit]

I am not sure what you all are doing, but the link in Footnote 28 don't go the article listed. Not sure why. But it needs to be fixed. ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.254.57 (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked the link to http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/otheropinions/index.ssf?/base/news-0/124072323678200.xml&coll=1 in:

Matalin, Mary; Carville, James (April 26, 2009). "Issues in mayoral election transcend race". Other Opinions. Times-Picayune (Metro ed.). New Orleans. p. B5. Retrieved April 26, 2009. (In the print version, Matalin's name comes first; in the web version, Carville's name is first.)

as permanently dead. It was first added on the day the op-ed was published, when it presumably worked. It was converted to an archive link in 2017 by a bot (thanks, WP:WikiBlame) and later changed from archive.is to archive.today, but the archived link didn't contain the cited article: it was a snapshot from 2012, at which point the page was a listing of then-recent editorials and opinions. AFAICT the oldest snapshots in archive.today are from 2012. I also looked at the Internet Archive: they have a snapshot from April 22, 2009—before the cited op-ed was published—but not again until June 27, 2009, when the oldest article available was from June 15. I tried browsing the site in the Wayback Machine to see if I could find the op-ed through another URL, but I couldn't find one. There might also be a current link somewhere on the Times-Picayune site, but from a brief attempt it seemed like old articles were limited to subscribers.

LiberalArtist (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]