Talk:Massimo Bitonci

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed for speedy deletion[edit]

Quite autobiographic, not meeting WP:POLITICIAN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisbeta (talkcontribs) 07:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of a national legislature, he does meet WP:POLITICIAN. If you have evidence that the article is autobiographical, {{COI}} would be a more appropriate template. But I urge you to edit the article or discuss specific problems here, rather than rely on templates. Thanks, Melchoir (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Probably I over-reacted (quite astonished). I will edit this page in order to make my point. BTW, as a noob I've a question: every deputy in every chamber in the world are supposed to have their own WP?--Louisbeta (talk) 08:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that seems to be the guideline. I suppose there are cases where the guideline might lead to a bad outcome, in which case it should be ignored. However, Bitonci has enough press coverage that there shouldn't be a problem with finding reliable sources to verify (or correct) the material here. Ultimately that's what notability is all about. Melchoir (talk) 17:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But any politician has enough press coverage: I think we can think that media coverage is a necessary but not sufficient condition. This one, for example has proposed no new law and only 9 modifications on laws (here, sorry for the italian) in 4 years of activity. Maybe we can improve this page with his xenophobic declarations (quite well known in Italy).--Louisbeta (talk) 12:36, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Massimo Bitonci. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]