Talk:Maurice Vachon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confused marriage status[edit]

That he "has been married twice and is currently married to his third wife" suggests to me that he's been married thrice not twice. Can anyone clear up the confusion?75.157.135.57 (talk) 06:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source listed says nothing about his marriages. It will need to be clarified and sourced or removed.Tomsv 98 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found a source and edited the information.Tomsv 98 (talk) 20:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Political involvement[edit]

At some point, he was a star candidate for the New Democratic Party. But I don't retrieve such information on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.120.156 (talk) 03:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, okay. Methinks you have him confused with his brother, actually. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 April 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Clearly not a case of WP:SNOW here, although in defence of the nominator, I would point out that some moves are sufficiently uncontroversial that they don't even need to be listed as a full RM. They can be boldly done, or listed at WP:RMT. That doesn't apply here though, and there is no consensus in favour of the move.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Maurice Vachon → Mad Dog Vachon – I'm flabbergasted that this article isn't located under Mad Dog Vachon. There's no disambiguation conflict, and there's no conflicting common name. The article even blatantly states that he is best known by the Mad Dog moniker. This should be an uncontroversial move per WP:SNOW. Feedback 19:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment that's an impossibility. There is no SNOW case here. You cannot as a nominator, in the nomination, claim SNOW. Without anyone registering opinions, it seems like gaming the system. You need opinions filed by many people to determine a SNOW. If there are only a few people, it's not a SNOW. Since there's no one when you filed the nomination, it's never SNOW. -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I said that it should be SNOW, not that it would be. Feedback 16:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Next time you have an uncontroversial move, use the technical move request mechanism, and that will be the end of it. What you've started here is an unnecessary time sink. Dicklyon (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your reprimand is misplaced when the very first user who commented made a point that he opposes a move without discussion. Feedback 16:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think he said that at all. He just said you can't call a SNOW close. Dicklyon (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dicklyon is correct, I did not register an opposition to the move request. I only think that using SNOW in the rationale is incorrect, highly inappropriate, and the nominator should keep that in mind in future move requests -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 04:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Key word: should. I was hoping for a unanimous vote, obviously, I wasn't stating that there already was one. Feedback 22:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The article says that's the common name, and this seems not to be disputed. Either name is 100% acceptable in terms of reader experience and WP:AT, with a redirect from the other. There seems a slight preference for the proposed move. So let us move on. Andrewa (talk) 09:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose For whatever reason, the nominator and others assume this to be non-controversial. Within the context of his professional career, yes, his most successful years were as "Mad Dog". However, as was the case with the failed RM for Allen Coage, having been a competitor in the Olympics lends weight to the notion that he was known to many by his real name. He performed as a professional wrestler for many years under his real name. When he appeared at the PPV in Omaha to do the spot with Kevin Nash and Shawn Michaels, Vince McMahon repeatedly referred to him in his commentary as "Maurice Vachon", not "Mad Dog". As I commented in another current RM from the same nominator, this is an attempt to forcefully turn many shades of gray into black and white. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 10:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Both names are interchangeably used. Impossible to prefer one or the other. I'll propose an alternative name when this discussion is over. --George Ho (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 11 May 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. See WP:TSC and WP:NICKNAME. Previous discussions have reached the same conclusion. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Maurice Vachon → Maurice "Mad Dog" Vachon – Although WP:TITLEFORMAT normally discourages quotation marks within titles, numerous sources use the proposed title: obituaries book, biographical dictionary, WWE Legends, this book, some autobiography, that book, book of lists, this book, Montreal Gazette, Intelligencer, White Bear Press, and CBC. As said in previous RM, "Maurice" and "Mad Dog" are separately used equally. George Ho (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. This proposal violates multiple WP titling norms, and I'm hard-pressed to find a single other case where we are using both the given name and the stand-alone nickname of someone in the same title. Do a WP:COMMONNAME analysis to demonstrate that the nickname is the most common name, if you don't think Maurice Vachon is, and then do a proper RM, or just leave it alone per the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" principle.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  07:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are Ed "Too Tall" Jones and Charles "Buddy" Rogers. For the record, SMcCandlish, I opposed changing to "Mad Dog Vachon". --George Ho (talk) 10:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I remember the Jones case now. It's because the RS really do usually call him literall "Ed 'Too Tall' Jones', with both the "Ed" and the nickname. Dunno about the Rogers case. Anyway, it's really rare here, so a really strong case would need to be made for it. "'Maurice' and 'Mad Dog' are separately used equally" is not the case we're looking for; rather, the case that they're almost never used separately. If the real name and the nick are used pretty much equally, we should use the real name, since it's more encyclopedic, and it's just what we do by default.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  11:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maurice Vachon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maurice_Vachon&oldid=1207247286"