Talk:May 2013 Stockholm riots

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who was killed? Who were the rioters?[edit]

I am guessing - because the article only alludes at that - that the rioters were mainly immigrants, and thus the short old men was also an immigrant. If this is the case, this needs to be clearly stressed. Otherwise, the article does a terribly poor job explaining the question "why would Swedes riot". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many "short old men"? :) Guess you mean "shot old man"...
You are looking for a simple explanation. You may not find one. Mange01 (talk) 19:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The question is already addressed in the backgrounds section, by Mats Berglund (a historian who's done research on riots). His view is then shared in the second paragraph of the analysis section, by Sarnecki. Narayanese (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sarnecki (as quoted in this article) merely points out that the rioters are unhappy with their situation, which is hardly surprising, but doesn't really explain why they express their discontent by rioting. Looking at the referenced article in Aftonbladet, his argument can pretty much be summed up as "violent people were responsible for the violence", again not much of an explanation. You can find violent people and discontents pretty much everywhere. What most people really want to know is why these particular criminals and discontents chose to riot at this particular time, which he doesn't even try to explain. Oh, and to answer Piotrus's question: yes, the old man who was shot was an immigrant. Portuguese, IIRC. Don't know why it's suddenly become taboo to even mention him... Maitreya (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For starters why is the nationality of this man of any importance? What's important is that he's dead and that the swedish police are looking into what happened (which AFAIK is a standard procedure everytime anyone is shot by a policeman). We don't know that his death had anything to do with the riots. We have one opinion (a pressrelease from Megafonen) that claims it to be so and we have several other sources, including inhabitants in Husby and one of Swedens most famous criminologists that say it has nothing to do with the riots and has only been used as an excuse. We can't include everyones view and theory including all the details, how would the article on the assassination of John F. Kennedy or for that matter the even larger investigation on the murder of Swedish primeminister Olof Palme look if we did so? GameOn (talk) 06:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Important or not, a lot of people want to know. I don't see any point in withholding that information. Once there's been more time for proper documentation and analysis of what actually happened it may be possible to make strong assertions about which explanations are credible and which aren't, assuming the whole thing isn't just quietly swept under the rug. At this early stage, however, I think it's premature to dismiss Megafonen's theory out of hand. There are always deeper underlying causes behind riots, which is why I think Sarnecki is really just pointing out the obvious without adding much of interest to the discussion, but that doesn't preclude the possibility that the shooting may have been the trigger. Maitreya (talk) 12:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2013 Stockholm riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2013 Stockholm riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2013 Stockholm riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]