Talk:Melissa Satta

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

True information of Melissa Satta[edit]

The last revision made by me MarkMysoe, was the correct information of Melissa Satta and her career with the sources provided. Melissa Satta's true occupation is not that of a model, television presenter or actor. After going through a deep research, I have found that she does not earn her income from modelling, television presenting or acting. Melissa Satta earns her income and fame from pursuing wealthy men under the false occupations of being a model, television presenter and actor as her income. The list of men and pictures were those that she had been in a relationship with and gained her income from. I believe the world should know the truth about Melissa Satta, and the false information of Melissa Satta being a model, television presenter and actor. Wikipedia is for the truth of information and not for false information. – MarkMysoe (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She is a model. And we don't need any relationships lists. Not notable information. Don't add it again. --Stryn (talk) 06:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The revision of information in the article is not accusing Melissa Satta of being a gold digger, it is what is announced in sources provided so that is the information that should be used not false information that somebody close to Melissa Satta has written down in the article previously. One source that is used to source most of the information in the article is broken. All what I have done is reviewed the article, researched the information and written the exact facts that is written in sources provided. As far as I'am aware of, It is not against Wikipedia's policy to add a notable persons relationship history. – MarkMysoe (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mark - you did not actually provide any reliable sources in your edits, what sources you did use were extremely questionable. It was also a massive violation of our WP:BLP policy. As you have been told multiple times, do NOT attempt to add this information again. Giant Snowman 11:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(after ec) You did not merely mention her relationships, which might be arguably relevant. You made serious statements of intent - specifically, that she was dating men for their money, and that is completely unacceptable in a BLP without impeccable sourcing, and even then we would need to discuss carefully whether and how to include. This is not acceptable, your edits are in clear violation of BLP policy. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Melissa Satta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth[edit]

Hi, Currently there's an edit war taking place over her date of birth
79.102.30.77 do you have any evidence to back up your change?. Her date of birth has been February 7, 1986 since creation (2010)[1] and although this should've been cited from the get go I can't see the editor would've lied ?
If you have any evidence to confirm the other DOB is correct I'd be more than happy to replace it,
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's not sourced at all, it should probably be removed completely per general WP:BLP policies. --Ebyabe (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]