Talk:Melodifestivalen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleMelodifestivalen is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 12, 2008.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 28, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 17, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
October 3, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
March 23, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
August 7, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 29, 2019, and January 29, 2022.
Current status: Former featured article


Copyedit[edit]

Removed previous template; consolidated with new template below

FA concerns[edit]

This older Featured Article has not been reviewed since its promotion in 2007, and the article needs an update to meet the current FA criteria. Issues:

  • There is a lot of unsourced content here. FAs are "supported by inline citations where appropriate";
  • Many of the citations do not cover the full preceding claims;
  • The prose needs work, for instance:
  • in the Hosting section, we go from the early 2000's to 2013, to 1975 and then again to the early 2000's. There are also repeated facts there (the Finals being held at the Friends Arena);
  • Since the wildcards' introduction, three have won the competition. In 2011 there were 15 wildcards. The wildcard system was discontinued in 2013. - is it going or is it discontinued?;
  • Considering that this is an annual event, it's concerning that the most recent source is from 2012.

Article needs work. RetiredDuke (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it needs work, I'll also see if I can add some sources this week. However I did notice that it was peer reviewed a year ago. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is correct, it wasn't in the article history so I missed it. RetiredDuke (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FA review[edit]

Orlando pirates[edit]

Haha 2A03:2880:20FF:3:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 07:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]