Talk:Memoirs of an Imperfect Angel/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article against GA criteris. First the quick fail passing based on the links and formatting issues, I found the ones below.

Disambiguations present as per Dablinks tool.
Checklinks show the presence of a number of dead links and unreliable sources like blogs and twitter, wrongly formatted references etc.
In the prose, appearence of a list structure from the singles section is extremely misleading and distracting. WP:NOTDIRECTORY applies here.

These things should be addressed soon and I give the nominater 3 days for it. Once they are addressed, I will start the prose and content review. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment[edit]

Hi. What's with "by critics who awarded it 69/100" in the lead? This is an average calculated by a single website that uses a mere selection of reviews - it is not a representative analysis of all critics. Hekerui (talk) 08:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah noticed it. But it uses Metacritic and it should be noted as such like The Fame. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Failing the nomination, as per nominater request. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]