Talk:Memorials for the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Language point[edit]

An anniversary is counted as ordinal, i.e. first, second, third and not cardinal i.e. one, two, three. There is no need to specify it, as in "Anniversary (ordinal)" It is better to just write 'Anniversary'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.216.253 (talk) 03:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

There is a tendency on Wikipedia to 'report' on on-going stories without consideration of their significance in the long term. As it stands, the article on the "22nd anniversary" is merely a description of what happened, without much in terms of vouching for its significance or notability. Will we really come back 50 years from now and say, wow, these 22nd Anniversary protests really made a difference! Very likely, these protests will never be mentioned again, not only on this encyclopedia, but also in news media in general, and no one will have the courage or desire to rework the article to an acceptable standard, leaving it to basically rot. This is not to mention that both the 21st and 22nd anniversary articles are in fact, simply about protests in Hong Kong, not about the anniversary per se, so they are not appropriately named either. Previously my intentions were to PROD, but I am going to compromise and ask for them to be merged and scaled down. To me this seems very reasonable and a middle-ground road to take, and I ask that editors who wishes to keep the article (such as its creator) consider these extenuating factors before simply voting it down. I believe that this article, along with that of the 21st Anniversary, should be merged into the general "memorials" article, and condensed to a paragraph or two each. Colipon+(Talk) 20:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a sensible solution, and saves us from deleting the other pages. It's also possible that the memorials section within the main article could be edited to include more information. The only challenge will be that, in order to avoid undue weight being given to a particular anniversary, someone will have to step in to curate the page and introduce new material to be more representative of the whole. Homunculus (duihua) 21:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tiananmen which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Memorials for the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]