Talk:Mersea Fort

Mersea Fort has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 5, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mersea Fort/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria[edit]

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical tweaks made, the article complies with MOS policies for grammar, as well as its general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article uses a fairly sizable variety of reputable sources. Nothing resembles original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all available encyclopedic aspects of its topic. No trivial or crufty content. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains a neutral approach to its subject. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since its creation last month, the article has not been subjected to edit warring. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All three images used are relevant to the article. All of them are accepted by the Wikimedia Commons, so there is no risk of fair use violation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Upon reading over this article, I believe it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]