Talk:Meshkinshahr Geothermal Power Plant

Capacity (copied from my talk page)

I think the 250 MW nameplate capacity is just wrong. This German source from 17 March 2016 talks about 5 MW.--Kopiersperre (talk) 08:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

@Kopiersperre: You are absolutely right. It seemed also dubious for me when I added this figure from the body text to the infobox, but I did not had a time to check the accuracy then. That article's text needs a checking and proper citations as most of the links at the end are dead. Beagel (talk) 16:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

250 MW came from this source. It seems to be a final plan but not implemented as I ca see from the other sources. Beagel (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

electricity generation capacity

hi dear.according to my researches and Farsi article regarding meshkinshahr geotermal capacity on Wikipedia,it should be 55 MW. Rezazeinali (talk) 23:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meshkinshahr Geothermal Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100927235951/http://news.moe.org.ir/vdcd2s0k6yt0x.a2y.html to http://news.moe.org.ir/vdcd2s0k6yt0x.a2y.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722015254/http://www.pajuhesh.ir/content/view/34/1/ to http://www.pajuhesh.ir/content/view/34/1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)