Talk:Metallic dragon

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2019. The result of the discussion was merge.

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 3 December 2019.

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

This discussion regarding this move has made this move seem technical in nature. Closing this discussion in order to post this move on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Steel1943 (talk) 04:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metallic dragon (Dungeons & Dragons) → Metallic dragon – This article has been the primary article, and only article, for the topic "Metallic dragon" for a few years. With that rationale, it should be moved to Metallic dragon, which is currently a redirect to Metallic dragon (Dungeons & Dragons), but it should be the other way around. Steel1943 (talk) 02:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The more concise title is a redirect to this unnecessarily disambiguated overly precise one; that's backwards. --Born2cycle (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support we don't disambiguate titles where we only have ONE topic, let alone a clear primary topic, for the base name. Jclemens (talk) 06:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - perfectly reasonable. BOZ (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.