Talk:Metrolinx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Brand"[edit]

The GTTA does not refer to "Metrolinx" as a "brand" anywhere on its website, but as the "name under which the GTTA conducts business". I have adjusted the article accordingly. Brands are for cattle and laundry detergents. Fortunately the GTTA is a distinguished enough body that it has not adopted this marketing industry buzzword, and Wikipedia need not either. The Wikipedia:Manual of Style recommends plain English instead of jargon. Ground Zero | t 22:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t really see what difference it makes to replace the word ‘brand’ with its definition — it’s the same thing regardless, just a with TransLink (the South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority), Nexus (the Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive), Centro (the West Midlands Passenger Transport Executive), and the like. I do think, though, that the first sentence of the article ought to say what they do. David Arthur (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because we should use plain English instead of marketing industry jargon. I agree that the first sentence should say what they do, and am satisfied with the current version. Ground Zero | t 23:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is late news, but with the May 14, 2009 merger of GO Transit and Metrolinx, 'Metrolinx' is now the legal name of 'Metrolinx' and 'GO Transit' is now a Metrolinx "brand". I use the term loosely because it is not yet clear exactly how GO Transit is being fit into the Metrolinx structure. Daveharr (talk) 00:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Former AUthorities[edit]

I have removed a reference to a "Greater Toronto Transit Operating Authority" as a predecessor because (1) it appears to be a garbled reference to the Toronto Area Transit Operating Authority, a former incarnation of GO Transit and (2) it was not a predecessor of Metrolinx. There has never been an agency responsible for overall regional transportation planning in the Greater Toronto Area prior to Metrolinx, unless we want to count the Ontario Ministry of Transportation. Daveharr (talk) 14:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRESTO device 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:PRESTO device 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:PRESTO device 1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metrolinx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Metrolinx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metrolinx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]