Talk:Miami Shores Thematic Resource

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Miami Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Miami Shores[edit]

The only issue I have with a list like this is that it seems to me that eventually each building will merit an article or at least part of an article. Unless they were all built at the same time by the same person and served the same functions, thus having the same history, then one article would suffice. I also wonder, this is kind of off the article subject but related, if there is a better map to use. One of Florida would be much better, in fact state maps would be much better overall. Not to be nitpicky but I know where Miami is, so do most, a state map would really be much more encyclopedic.A mcmurray 17:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually going to create individual articles for each, when I discovered the concept of listifying. It made sense with this one, since they're all Building at. I figure when they're House at or Building at, they're not distinctive enough for separate recognition. Also got to understand more about the Multiple Property Submission concept, which only made the list thing seem more sensible. This way there's at least some info about the places, and if it turns out that any of them are notable in and of themselves, then individual articles can be created. By someone else, yo. :)

As to the map, I kinda agree. I just never got around to figuring out how to use the Florida map instead. It was sorta "go with what you know". I know one of the Texas folks uses state maps for their NRHP articles. Hm, maybe I should take a closer look... --Ebyabe 14:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miami Shores Thematic Resource. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140927013641/http://www.flheritage.com/facts/reports/places/index.cfm?fuseaction=ListAreas&county=Dade to http://www.flheritage.com/facts/reports/places/index.cfm?fuseaction=ListAreas&county=dade

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]