Talk:Michael T. Sauer

This article was nominated for deletion on May 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus, defaults to keep.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

United States courts and judges

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comments[edit]

Delete. There is an arbitrary large number of judges in the United States justice system. Should it be acceptable for every single judge to have an article here on Wikipedia just because they ruled on a case? I think the answer is no. High profile cases such as the O.J. Simpson trials might warrant a page for Lance Ito. A page for Michael Sauer just because he sentenced Paris to jail doesn't really provide him any notoriety. Tigerman81 05:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Negatori. I came on to Wikipedia to find out about this guy because I was frustrated about all the news stories about his decision carefully skirting around his name, nevermind finding out about his actual office or any details about him. It's appropriate for Wikipedia to have an entry about him as he is part of a high-profile and noteworthy event. MKFreeberg 20:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

His office number and email address should be posted in the wiki —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.76.82.89 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Why?WP 03:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i disagree in the strongest terms. this would alost certainly invite people who feel very strongly about the hilton case. (which, by the way, is exaggerated out of proportion.) furthermore, personal contact information has no place in wikipedia, because it is no ecyclopedic information.--Nevrdull 13:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let the entry remain[edit]

One event does make a moment, it becomes a snapshot in time of people and situations. This moment has become a pop news item that will need explaining to the public. that is the reason I cam to it and the reason other will as well. I wanted a pic of the judge - it was here ... that is why if for no other reason —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.109.75.155 (talk) 01:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It definately should stick, for the time being. Maybe when the newstory isn't so fresh it could be removed.--Iamstillhiro1112 03:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People, this was decided last month, see the archived discussion above. No need to comment again (the 1st comment was left in the wrong area). If someone thinks it should be deleted then they can AFD the article. Till then, let it be. Aboutmovies 03:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced items[edit]

The following was removed as unsourced per WP:LIVING

==TV Personality== Sauer has previously admitted that he has always wanted to pursue a TV personality. "Appearing tough and causing headlines is how I want to be known" he said to Barbara Walters on Monday, June 18th, 2007 on The View. When asked why he was so harsh with Paris Hilton he commented, "Barbara, L.A. needs to show that we are strong on crime and we need to show that no celebrity is above the law. If I could I'd sentence her to two years in jail."

Feel free to re-add when sourced. Aboutmovies 20:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the rumored homosexuality incident? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.147.166.87 (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael T. Sauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611145232/http://www.buzznet.com/tags/celebs/photos/?id=5803461 to http://www.buzznet.com/tags/celebs/photos/?id=5803461

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]