Talk:Mike Goldberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I want some citations, especially on the latin!

It seems he is currently covering Bally's Fight Night, MMA event (new to me). Watching it now (7/12/21 7:30 PM CDT) on Fox Sports Midwest. See this article. https://www.sportsvideo.org/2021/06/25/ballys-fight-night-takes-data-driven-fight-coverage-to-new-level/ And actually here's the announcement from June. https://roundbyroundboxing.com/ballys-corporation-and-oscar-de-la-hoyas-ko-entertainment-form-partnership/ --Gearheadham (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life section[edit]

The info. in the personal life section comes from the new "MMA/Fight" Magazine with Tito Ortiz and Jenna Jameson on the cover. I don't remember the name of the magazine so could someone put it on here.Thanks.(MgTurtle 23:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Lack of Knowledge[edit]

I think it should be noted that his lack of MMA knowledge which has caused him ridicule all over the internet should be noted somehow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GNU4eva (talkcontribs) 23:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminate Criticism Section?[edit]

The only contents of the criticism section are an uncited claim about Goldberg invading Rogan's personal space. 1) I've never heard this criticism before; 2) A Google search for "mike goldberg joe rogan personal space" only turned up a Wikipedia clone and lone facebook picture. Until there is proper documentation, I think it's appropriate to eliminate the criticism section. Nsfreeman (talk) 15:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adderal addiction "reported"[edit]

We need a cite for this. I can't find a single source that is citing is anything but rumors. Hexrei2 (talk) 07:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well I don't claim to be some superstar editor or anything, but Goldie has now come out and denied the rumor entirely. Since it was just a rumor with no substantiated source, and the man himself has denied completely here: (http://www.mmafighting.com/2013/1/4/3838142/mike-goldberg-says-health-issue-caused-him-to-miss-ufc-155-denies), I'm going to remove it. I can see an argument for putting both the rumor (with a source, this time) and the denial in, I suppose, but at this point I don't see a need for it.Hexrei2 (talk) 05:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok screw it. I'll put it all in and let god sort em out.Hexrei2 (talk) 05:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not God, but I sorted it out. Just the facts. The rumor itself was sourced to a no longer existent (and ridiculously un-newslike) page, anyway. No point even mentioning it. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Goldberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]