Talk:Miley: The Movement/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) 16:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

Typo in the lead "six six"

 Done

"For me, the movement is something that represents, like, taking over the world."[8]" not verbatim from the source

Cyrus says this piece in the video attached, should I find a reference that says that quote in text?

"Footage" is mentioned in the article but the reference only mentions "pictures". footage is particularly cinema or film.

 Done

Ref for breakup with Hemsworth

"the track itself charted lower than expected" who expected?

 Done

What is a "more mixed review"?

 Done

"Kia Makarechi from The Huffington Post was critical of the decision to avoid mentioning Hemsworth and toning-down of the criticism she received after the MTV Video Music Awards" "she" refers to: 1) Hemsworth, 2) Makarechi, or 3) Cyrus? I suppose the third…

 Done

"years' past." years past?

 Done

"In its original broadcast in the United States on October 2, 2013, Miley: The Movement was watched by approximately 1.6 million viewers; in doing so, it earned a 0.8 rating in the 18–49 demographic." awkward wording, "in doing so" is used, although nothing was "done". could you rephrase?

 Done

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Sources are reliable, inline citations are present in the correct places.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   "Broad in its coverage" could be better met by providing details of the extra 30 minutes of footage, beyond the bare bones of "it was broadcast".

 Done

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article is reasonably neutral with positive and negative reviews detailed.

2. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable; no edits in the last 12 days.

3. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Two images are used, one appropriately licensed through flickr; the other, non-free, image has a valid FUR. Captions are suitable and demonstrate the images' relevance to the article.

4. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Close to a pass, so I am not going to put this on hold. C679 17:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Aside from that one note above that I have a question on, I believe I've answered all of your comments. Thanks so much for your time, I appreciate it! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

The discrepancy was, I believe, just a matter of using "the" instead of "a". Should be straightforward to address. C679 17:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Ah I see what you mean, I've taken care of that portion! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

• The criteria is now met, passing article, closing review. C679 19:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks so much! WikiRedactor (talk) 20:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)