Talk:Ministry of Culture and Tourism (China)
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Copy and paste issues[edit]
Cfls, looks like this is heavily copy-and-paste of machine-translated text into the article. You should probably review WP:COPYPASTE and WP:NOMISSION first. Amigao (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- All sources had been clearly addressed in the article. All sources' reliability is comparable to how the entries of United States Department of Education, United Kingdom Department for Education, and other worldwide government agencies cite. Government sources here are reliable for introducing its responsibilities and internal organizational structures. The responsibilities of the government agency are not a mission statement per WP:NOMISSION. As in United States Department of Education, there is "Purpose and functions" section, as well as "Organization" section. All citations in this article are comparable to those of the US government agency. Cfls (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please keep in mind that WP:PRIMARY is hard WP:POLICY and point #5 of WP:PRIMARY is particularly relevant here. Also, just because you see it on other government-related articles, does not mean that it's compliant with policy because many of those articles also have similar issues, too. Amigao (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Caution will be implemented when citing. Please also note that for the government agency articles, the government-related sources are reliable for introducing a government agency's assumed responsibilities and internal organizational structures, as most of them are articulated as part of a legal order or an executive order. If reliable media reports found that the government agencies had created internal organization structures other than those articulated in the laws and orders, contributors may add them to the Controversies sections or other relevant parts of the entry of the government agency. Cfls (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- One should avoid Controversies sections per WP:CSECTION. Also, please keep in mind the policy of WP:NOTDIR and the content guideline of WP:LISTCRITERIA for any embedded lists of organizational structures. Amigao (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Caution will be implemented when citing. Please also note that for the government agency articles, the government-related sources are reliable for introducing a government agency's assumed responsibilities and internal organizational structures, as most of them are articulated as part of a legal order or an executive order. If reliable media reports found that the government agencies had created internal organization structures other than those articulated in the laws and orders, contributors may add them to the Controversies sections or other relevant parts of the entry of the government agency. Cfls (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please keep in mind that WP:PRIMARY is hard WP:POLICY and point #5 of WP:PRIMARY is particularly relevant here. Also, just because you see it on other government-related articles, does not mean that it's compliant with policy because many of those articles also have similar issues, too. Amigao (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)