Talk:Mirabito Outdoor Classic

Mirabito Outdoor Classic has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 27, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 19, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Mirabito Outdoor Classic‎ was the first outdoor game in the 74-year history of the American Hockey League?

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mirabito Outdoor Classic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will begin reviewing the article as soon as I can.--Dom497 (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Quality of article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Article agrees with the Manual of Style.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Checked sources and everything looks good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Every sentence in the article has at least one reference/source.

C. No original research:
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Article cover all the important/major content about the topic.

B. Focused:
Article stays on topic at all times and has a consistent "flow".
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Took a look at the article history and everything looks stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
All images in the article are tagged and licensed properly.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Pictures are good but in my opinion, a picture what the stadium looked liked inside during the event would be great to add, yet at the same time it may be hard to find one.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Please see 6B for more info on what can be improved in the article. Also, if a picture of the inside of th stadium can't be found, this article is still worthy of a pass.--Dom497 (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree, but unfortunately I could not find any free images. I am under the impression that any non-free images would not pass fair use. I did see some images on flickr that weren't properly licensed but I'll try contacting the users to see if they would be willing to change them for use on WP. I have never had any luck with this in the past and so I wouldn't hold my breath on this, most users never even give a reply.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to say that you will be able to find a picture so I will pass the article right now!--Dom497 (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I certainly hope so. Thanks again for the review and the pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 21:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mirabito Outdoor Classic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150102081351/http://www.valleycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=420890 to http://www.valleycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=420890

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mirabito Outdoor Classic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]