Talk:MirrorLink

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MirrorLink article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 5 August 2012 by reviewer Czarkoff (talk · contribs).

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improper self published sources[edit]

While I understand the WP MOS, however to say that a nokia published article is an improper self published source is going too far. I feel that the tag for 'self published sources' should be removed from this article. The draft version of the article contained a link (citation) to the CCC website, which has already been removed. -Ambar (talk) 02:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the home site of topic is OK in "External links", but you shouldn't rely on primary sources, and specifically press releases, as their content is generally promotional and not trustworthy. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Compatibility issues and versions[edit]

Hi,

In forums a lot of people are complaining about compatibility issues. This mostly has to do with incompatibility between versions of mirrorlink.

For instance a car stereo that support Mirrorlink 1.0 does not work together with a new phone that supports Mirrorlink 1.1. Still new car systems are delivered with the old version of the software.

I don't have insight in the specifics of this, but it would be a very welcome addition to this article.

Suggested addition: Which versions are available, which versions are planned and which of them are compatible to work together.

Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.145.193.234 (talk) 09:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at web reports from people using Mirror Link dificult to find a positive one. Seems people are sucked into purchasing Navigation apps because car companies have been fooled into installing this system. The Navigation apps all have the same poor reviews and talk of cost well in excess of standalone sat navs. The people feel oblighed to pay as they have a 16,000 pound unusable screen if they dont. Clever marketing by Mirrorlink app develipers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.81.37 (talk) 10:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MirrorLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smartphone replication listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smartphone replication. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]