Talk:Mission Chicago

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neither this article or the article referencing Operation Detroit link to any source that verifies those names were actually used. Is there any source out there that does?

All documentation I've read says the airborne operations were rolled into Operation Neptune.

Operation Chicago is not the correct nickname[edit]

The true nickname of this opération is Operation Albany. Operation Chicago is a later landing of gliders. Reference : http://www.6juin1944.com/assaut/aeropus/en_page.php?page=para —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.247.161.21 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]


Correct. Many many errors in this stub. Also, it was, per the operations order, mission Albany. There is a source for this (and also for the misnomer Mission Detroit in another article) and when I can I will clean up both if no one has done it before me. The US airborne missions were:
  • parachute - Albany (101), Boston (82) - early on D-Day, 800 aircraft and 6 regiments
  • glider - Chicago (101), Detroit (82) - pre-dawn D-Day 100 tugs and their gliders, support
  • glider - Keokuck (101), Elmira (82) - evening of D-Day 200 tugs and their gliders, support
  • glider - Galveston and Hackensack (both 82d) - D+1 morning, 200 tugs and their gliders, 1 regiment--Buckboard 06:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mission Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]