Talk:Moel Maelogan

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spelling[edit]

Obviously a difficult one to spell! But is this correct? On the UK Ordnance Survey map this hill is spelt Moel Maelogen. Does anyone know which is correct? Debnigo (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You raise an interesting point! The spelling as given is that standardly used by the Wind Farm business, and given that that is the locoation's main claim to fame, is probably reason for this spelling when the page was originally started. It's hard to say which is the correct spelling, of course - it's a name, not a Welsh word, and OS maps often have names spelled incorrectly! Anyway, I've created a redirect page from Moel Maelogen, and added that this is the OS spelling in the opening sentence. Hogyn Lleol (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one, good solution, thanks. Debnigo (talk) 00:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moel Maelogan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724030948/http://www.ailwynt.co.uk/facts.html to http://www.ailwynt.co.uk/facts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]