Talk:Moira (Utrecht)

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Squatting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References[edit]

I added some references, is this enough or do I need to add some more? Charlie Foxtrot66 (talk) 05:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would say there are enough references added to establish notability, which is good, BUT the references must back up the cited info. It's quite weak to have a whole paragraph cited to the project's website (www.moira-utrecht.nl) surely there should be secondary reliable sources which could be used here. Also the activities section would need references for what is claimed ie supporting initiatives and organizing ten events a year, which is not what the two cited sources are talking about. Mujinga (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Charlie Foxtrot66 you have reverted my edits without coming here to discuss as requested, i'll assume you don't read edit summaries and would advise you to do so. No matter, I'll add my summaries here as well for you, happy to discuss further if something remains unclear. Mujinga (talk) 14:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History: remove uncited statements, see "References" talk discussion
See also: trim see also to other utrecht places, it's not necessary to have a large see also section when there's the navbox
Activities: section not backed by sources, see talk page discussion "References"
trim lead to reflect article

Restored the informations anad added more references. It would be welcome the opinion of a moderator Charlie Foxtrot66 (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the museumtijdschrift link that actually backs up a claim (Moira Foundation offers a stage to early career artists and musicians who have made little or no name in the established circuit. The exhibition space Moira organizes about ten events every year.). I've deleted the dross, perhaps we can build it up again but to repeat, claims need to be backed by reliable sources and the more I look for this project, the less I find. What makes it notable? Mujinga (talk) 14:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking around and I'm not finding much at all really. This link is borderline but does at least give a reference for the date of occupation - http://www.wolvenburgutrecht.nl/gevangenis-wolvenplein/bijeenkomst-moira-geanimeerd-verslag/ Mujinga (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're trying to do but I don't like it and I think you don't have this right. This matter needs a moderator, I can't get why anybody like you can waste or disturbe the activities of the other contributors, just for who knows wich reason.... Charlie Foxtrot66 (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]