Talk:Monoliths & Dimensions

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

leak[edit]

is it worth mentioning that this leaked? 68.94.197.221 (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this up before editing the page with that information. For the most part, it wouldn't be worth mentioning that, especially if all there is on the page about the leak would be "this album got leaked". When talking about albums being leaked, it usually isn't notable at all. From experience, I've observed that it rarely is notable enough for wikipedia when an album is leaked. This is a big problem on articles of upcoming albums, because there, at times, can be an overwhelming amount of anonymous users who keep posting on the page "this album got leaked". That's a problem because the editors don't really bother to give a reference to this claim or give a link to this claim. When those people do give links or references, they're usually not very notable. One exception where leaks could be notable enough to mention on wikipedia is if the leak, for instance, causes controversy of epic proportions; for instance, if the band wanted to sue the website that first leaked their music, then that would probably be notable enough to put on the article. Thanks for bringing this up before editing the article and having the edit most likely reverted soon afterwards. Backtable^{Speak to Me}about what I have done 20:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with name?[edit]

i think the page is mildly misnamed: everywhere I've looked calls it "Monoliths and Dimensions" not "Monoliths & Dimensions", so it would make sense to change the page name to that, which I think requires moving it. anyone agree? 81.154.149.197 (talk) 10:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I searched on google for both "Monoliths & Dimensions" and "Monoliths and Dimensions". The amount of results that showed up were 300,000 and 303,000, respectively. That's quite even, if I say so myself (49.75% versus 50.25%). There are quite a few results that had the phrase "Monoliths & Dimensions", even under the latter searching terms. But http://blog.southernlord.com/?p=177 calls the album "Monoliths & Dimensions", and so does the official Southern Lord website. Therefore, it would be my vote to not move this page. However, if it wasn't for your suggestion, it probably wouldn't have come to my attention that there is no wikipedia page titled "Monoliths and Dimensions", not even a redirect page to this article. I will make a redirect page with that title, thanks to your suggestion leading up to this decision of mine. Thank you. Backtable^{Speak to Me}about what I have done 20:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hunting&Gathering (Cydonia)?[edit]

On my copy, track 3 does not show any spaces around the ampersand. This also appears to be the case with all the releases. Shouldn't this be reflected on the tracklist? -Akira Himaru (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll change it. Thanks for posting. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 22:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]