Talk:More Than Two

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Book cover[edit]

I've uploaded and added the book cover. Could someone look over the legalese / fair use copyright things? Karlos77 (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I have a conflict of interest for editing this article, so don't want to edit it directly. However, here are some secondary sources that another editor can use to improve the article:

Reviews in print media:

Other noteworthy online mentions:

Many interviews and media mentions of Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert are available here. (Someone might want to start a page for Franklin...)

Here's The original Indiegogo that funded the book and a post on Polyamory in the News about it (and another post on Polyamory in th News about the crowdfunding launch).

Hope this is helpful!

Margareta (talk) 00:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph "Criticism" is not supported by the reference provided and may even be defamatory of Franklin Veaux. Reference [8] given in support contains no references to More Than Two whatsoever. It should be replaced by a reference with evidence of abuse by Veaux. Likewise, mentioning the cult seems just a biased statement without any relationship to the book. I don't usually write for Wikipedia. I came here to link to this page but couldn't do so because of its poor quality. 76.95.214.213 (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reference 9 seems to have been unpublished by Medium.com. 76.95.214.213 (talk) 04:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

further trims[edit]

The claim (which I intend to remove) is made that Veaux launched his site in 1998 as "one of the first web resources about polyamory" when I'm certain LoveMore.com had a thriving forum by then. There were certainly poly-oriented BBSes a decade earlier, some of which went to the Web as feasible. The Polyamory Society definitely formed 1996. As well, alt.polyamory was well-established years earlier, so "one of the first online" becomes increasingly vague, and I don't see where "one of the first hundred or so" is something worth mention. If someone can make a substantiated claim that it was "biggest" or "best" or "most popular," then please include that.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The book has been disowned by one of the two authors[edit]

Here's the reference: https://brighterthansunflowers.com/2019/11/29/what-i-got-wrong-in-more-than-two-the-dark-night-of-the-soul/ . I don't know if it's OK to mention it on the article, so I let other contributors decide what to do with this information.

Thanks, 77.206.169.95 (talk) 12:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]