Talk:Moshe Heinemann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I deleted the sentence "In any case, it is unclear that Rabbi Auerbach would agree with Rabbi Heinemann's ruling as there are other issues such as grama and the holiness of Yom Tov."

With respect, there is little doubt that Rabbi Auerbach would agree with Rabbi Heinemann's ruling. Rabbi Auerbach would not generally forbid that which was otherwise permitted simply because of the "holiness of [Shabbos and] Yom Tov." For example, Rabbi Auerbach permitted raising and lowering an air conditioner thermostat (analog, NOT digital) in the following manner: raising it when the air conditioner is on, and lowering it when the air conditioner is off.

Significantly, no Posek has suggested that Rabbi Auerbach would have forbidden adjusting the temperature on a Sabbath Mode oven, and the non-participation of his sons and son-in-law in the Kol Koreh (especially Rabbi Ezriel Auerbach, son-in-law of Rabbi Yosef Shalom Eliashiv) speaks volumes.

Danielb613 (talk) 20:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your proof that RSZA would agree with this ruling is far from iron-clad. Not signing a Kol Koreh is also not much of an indication of anything. Many Kol Korehs come out that are not signed by all the people who agree with them. --Ezra Wax (talk) 23:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What proof/source do you have that rabbi Heinemann retracted his psak on YomTov Temperature adjustments? At the time, he published a teshuva defending his view despite the Kol Korei! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.241.116.233 (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shabbos mode ovens - Non neutral[edit]

I have no opinion on this one way or the other, but this reads like an editorial opinion piece, not an encyclopedia article. Plus clearly full of original research. High Leader (talk) 19:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]