Talk:Mosman Council

	Australia portal Mosman Council is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Local government areas of New South Wales#Reviews of local government areas|2015 review of local government boundaries]] The anchor (#Reviews of local government areas) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Separate page for the Local Government Area[edit]

As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the Municipality of Mosman, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 11:16, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

suburb list[edit]

I have changed the list of suburbs from the DLG site, because

these lists are at best lists of suburbs and localities. The case of Mosman in particular is interesting - accord to the GNB, the municipality contains exactly one suburb, Mosman [1]
Many of the names on the list were not even localities, simply beaches or points (or military installations!).

JPD 09:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning suburbs in LGAs to remove redlinks[edit]

Hi, Can people who know or care about this LGA please have a look at this message and see if they can please help solve any redlinks in the "suburbs in this LGA" section of this page? (Usually solution is either to adding a stub about the suburb / locality in question, or to remove it from the LGA's list). -- All the best, Nickj (t) 04:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Population growth contradiction[edit]

The article says that the population growth to y/e 30/6/2006 made this LGA the 76th fastest growing, and then it states that it is the 97th fastest. --David Broadfoot (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]