Talk:Motorola A780

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Specs[edit]

The specifications and features table I removed were a copyright violation, copied directly from Phonescoop or a mirror. Only restore this text if you are the owner of the copyright or you have obtained permission. Thank you, The Hooded Man 03:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MicroSD[edit]

Did the phone really have MicroSD? Micro SD was announced in 2005. a year after the phone was released

94.195.151.248 (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

tagged npov because of text like this:

1.3 A780 does not come with
  1. Qwerty keyboard
         * On-screen stylus keyboard
  2. Wi-Fi
  3. US navigation
  4. Stable operating system 
  5. Hi-Speed USB (480 Mb/s)
  6. Hi-Fi stereo bluetooth (A2DP profile)
[edit]
1.3.1 Difficult design for J2ME

Let's be objective here. I don't have any problem with the OS being "stable"! —Dan 00:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe change to prose rather than list with specific crticisms that have been rased in reviews?Billlion 19:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write tag[edit]

There is no point adding the re-write tag without making some specific suggestions on the discussion page as what aspects need work. I'll remove the tag for the moment, but please feel free to reinstate it when you have explained your reasons here.Billlion (talk) 11:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikpeida is not a catalog repository, and I don't think this article follows the wiki standard such as template for mobile phones, the image placement, and so forth. That's why I added the tag. --Appletrees (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an example of a really good phone article as inspiration?Billlion (talk) 11:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Motorola A780. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130415123736/http://wiki.openezx.org/A780 to http://wiki.openezx.org/A780
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090113151553/http://moto4lin.sourceforge.net/wiki/A780 to http://moto4lin.sourceforge.net/wiki/A780
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501151124/http://www.motorolafans.com/ to http://www.motorolafans.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]