Talk:Moulsecoomb

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brighton Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Article text[edit]

The text of this article as it stands is essentially word-for-word from here. I will attempt a re-write... Hassocks5489 12:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of tweaking, in particular removing an unreferenced comment (with a citation request tag) out of the intro, which looked bad. I've put a geographical note into the intro instead. Perhaps too much detail about roads for an intro, but not a big problem I don't think.

We could really do with saying something about what Moolscoomb Place actually is, and its history, and perhaps providing a photo of the building. – Kieran T ^(talk) 13:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back in circulation, Kieran. I have just spent my lunch hour rewriting the first part, which I am just going to dump into the article now. I can probably sort out a pic of M. Place sometime next month. More rewriting will come when I get a chance - probably this evening... Hassocks5489 13:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

Because the descriptions of all the different parts of Moulsecoomb are a bit confusing, I might try to draw a diagram or map. Perhaps "Before and After" might be particularly useful ... I'll see. Knowing how long it took me to draw this puts me off slightly! Hassocks5489 13:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]