Talk:Mrs. Jarramie's Genie

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gilbert and Sullivan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gilbert and SullivanWikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanTemplate:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanGilbert and Sullivan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ernest[edit]

The article lists the character Ernest as "Peppercorn"; the Era review has him as "Pepperton". Also the actor is given in the Era as "Mr J. Wilbraham", not, as here, "Charles Wilbraham. Do we have a better source for the alternatives? - Tim riley (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Later: the above can be ignored. The Era is correct on both counts - see image of Savoy programme now added to article. - Tim riley (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mrs. Jarramie's Genie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004081452/https://www.gsarchive.net/companions/gas2.html to https://www.gsarchive.net/companions/gas2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]