Talk:Murder of George Harry Storrs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

Was he the third son? I have him as the second, though there is certainly time for another son between George 1860 and James 1856. I have the third son as William 1866. In dynastic terms James with seven children before William senior died would have been a much better bet, so the apparent preference for GH over James looks a little odd.Optymystic (talk) 23:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"George inherited the controlling share of William's business." Did he really? or was it split three ways between the sons. How did control pass back to James on the death of George Harry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Optymystic (talkcontribs) 12:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Murder of George Harry Storrs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murder of George Harry Storrs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]